<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s time we rate the quality of the coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee</link>
	<description>Great coffee comes in small doses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tingom</title>
		<link>http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee/comment-page-1#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tingom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>Hi everybody. Thanks for the good feedback on this post. I&#039;m glad to see some of you are willing to help out and even more: that you agree with me that we need to do this.

As others have written and emailed me it&#039;s become clear that by providing a responsible ratings for coffee shops, we can make coffee in Arizona better.

I&#039;m going to be working on setting up a few things in this area. We need to definately have multiple criteria and I&#039;d love to have a people&#039;s choice. Some way for people to have their say regardless of what the reviewer says about a coffee house.

Thanks -
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody. Thanks for the good feedback on this post. I&#8217;m glad to see some of you are willing to help out and even more: that you agree with me that we need to do this.</p>
<p>As others have written and emailed me it&#8217;s become clear that by providing a responsible ratings for coffee shops, we can make coffee in Arizona better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be working on setting up a few things in this area. We need to definately have multiple criteria and I&#8217;d love to have a people&#8217;s choice. Some way for people to have their say regardless of what the reviewer says about a coffee house.</p>
<p>Thanks -<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeFTrevino</title>
		<link>http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee/comment-page-1#comment-2216</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeFTrevino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 19:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee#comment-2216</guid>
		<description>This is about time. I&#039;ll be more than happy to hammer out criteia and do reviews in this area. I also agree that a double espresso is the only true way to evaluate a shops coffee aptitude. If proper care is taken in this single area it reflects the same care that is most likely taken in other shop aspects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is about time. I&#8217;ll be more than happy to hammer out criteia and do reviews in this area. I also agree that a double espresso is the only true way to evaluate a shops coffee aptitude. If proper care is taken in this single area it reflects the same care that is most likely taken in other shop aspects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee/comment-page-1#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 19:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>I think the dual-ratings system is the best idea.  Personally, I like reviews by single reviewers, because then I can get a feel as to whether or not I agree with them in general and want to pay attention to what they have to say.  But this might simply be because I often find myself disagreeing with the average American consumer.

As an example, here is my father&#039;s coffeshop rating system for coffeeshops in Seattle.  You can probably tell that he is really particular about what he likes in a good coffeeshop, but for him the quality of the espresso doesn&#039;t mean a whole lot (aside from where the bean comes from):

http://home.earthlink.net/~jimfortheearth/

In contrast, I use a rating system with categories for: ease of transport (again a more personal thing because I don&#039;t have a car); seating (i.e. lots of big comfy chairs, or a couple of hard stools); music (loud, repetitive and obnoxious or pleasant?); overall atmosphere; espresso quality; food quality; and whether or not I will visit it again.  I also have an &quot;other&quot; category for other comments about the place.  I think the &quot;Will visit again?&quot; category is probably the most important for me.  

Anyway, good luck with establishing a review system!  I might be willing to pitch in occasionally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the dual-ratings system is the best idea.  Personally, I like reviews by single reviewers, because then I can get a feel as to whether or not I agree with them in general and want to pay attention to what they have to say.  But this might simply be because I often find myself disagreeing with the average American consumer.</p>
<p>As an example, here is my father&#8217;s coffeshop rating system for coffeeshops in Seattle.  You can probably tell that he is really particular about what he likes in a good coffeeshop, but for him the quality of the espresso doesn&#8217;t mean a whole lot (aside from where the bean comes from):</p>
<p><a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~jimfortheearth/" rel="nofollow">http://home.earthlink.net/~jimfortheearth/</a></p>
<p>In contrast, I use a rating system with categories for: ease of transport (again a more personal thing because I don&#8217;t have a car); seating (i.e. lots of big comfy chairs, or a couple of hard stools); music (loud, repetitive and obnoxious or pleasant?); overall atmosphere; espresso quality; food quality; and whether or not I will visit it again.  I also have an &#8220;other&#8221; category for other comments about the place.  I think the &#8220;Will visit again?&#8221; category is probably the most important for me.  </p>
<p>Anyway, good luck with establishing a review system!  I might be willing to pitch in occasionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Haeger</title>
		<link>http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee/comment-page-1#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Haeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 08:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>I love it.  All I can say is, &quot;It&#039;s about time&quot;.  

I think there should be a standardized rating system in place for each shop.  A friend of mind has developed what I think to be a great system.  I&#039;ll ask him if I can borrow it from him.  I&#039;ll shoot you an email if I get ahold of it.  

I would like to apply it to my own review blog, but I seem to have lost the system somewhere.  

If you need any help with articles on proper technique or theories, I would love to help out.  In fact, I do believe I have one lined up for the not-too-distant future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it.  All I can say is, &#8220;It&#8217;s about time&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I think there should be a standardized rating system in place for each shop.  A friend of mind has developed what I think to be a great system.  I&#8217;ll ask him if I can borrow it from him.  I&#8217;ll shoot you an email if I get ahold of it.  </p>
<p>I would like to apply it to my own review blog, but I seem to have lost the system somewhere.  </p>
<p>If you need any help with articles on proper technique or theories, I would love to help out.  In fact, I do believe I have one lined up for the not-too-distant future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOMAS</title>
		<link>http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee/comment-page-1#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>TOMAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 02:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arizona-coffee.com/2006/its-time-we-rate-the-quality-of-the-coffee#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris - great to see that you&#039;re &quot;pouring&quot; yourself into the Arizona Coffee scene!  I wish I could contribute, but I&#039;m far from being a passionate coffee drinker/coffee conoisseur (give me a single shot iced mocha from Coffee Rush I&#039;m golden :) ).  Well, at the very least I can provide some moral support, tell my friends about the site, &amp; cheer the blog on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris &#8211; great to see that you&#8217;re &#8220;pouring&#8221; yourself into the Arizona Coffee scene!  I wish I could contribute, but I&#8217;m far from being a passionate coffee drinker/coffee conoisseur (give me a single shot iced mocha from Coffee Rush I&#8217;m golden <img src='http://www.arizona-coffee.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).  Well, at the very least I can provide some moral support, tell my friends about the site, &amp; cheer the blog on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.183 seconds -->
